Perang total dan mobilisasi sumber daya nasional dalam Perang Dunia II: Pembelajaran strategis bagi ketahanan nasional Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17977/um022v8i22025p441-451Keywords:
ketahanan nasional, tata kelola adaptif, paradigma keamanan, strategi geopolitikAbstract
Total war and the mobilization of national resources during World War II: Strategic insights for Indonesia’s national resilience
This study highlights the importance of transforming Indonesia's national resilience in the face of contemporary threats such as cyberattacks, disinformation, ecological disasters, and geopolitical dynamics. Employing a qualitative approach with an intrinsic case study design, data were collected through policy analysis, interviews, and participatory observation. The findings reveal institutional fragmentation, weak intersectoral coordination, limited public participation, and threat literacy. The study proposes a conceptual model of national resilience comprising five dimensions: institutional structure, sectoral integration, adaptive capacity, public awareness, and geopolitical orientation. It emphasizes that without synergy among these elements, the resilience system remains vulnerable. Therefore, a new paradigm is needed more adaptive and participatory focusing on institutional reform, community empowerment, and a sharper geopolitical strategy in the Indo-Pacific region.
Penelitian ini menyoroti pentingnya transformasi ketahanan nasional Indonesia dalam menghadapi ancaman kontemporer seperti serangan siber, disinformasi, bencana ekologis, dan dinamika geopolitik. Menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan desain studi kasus intrinsik, data dikumpulkan melalui analisis kebijakan, wawancara, dan observasi partisipatif. Hasil menunjukkan adanya fragmentasi kelembagaan, lemahnya koordinasi antar sektor, serta minimnya partisipasi masyarakat dan literasi ancaman. Studi ini mengembangkan model konseptual ketahanan nasional yang terdiri atas lima dimensi: struktur kelembagaan, integrasi sektor, kapasitas adaptif, kesadaran masyarakat, dan orientasi geopolitik. Ditekankan bahwa tanpa sinergi antar elemen tersebut, sistem ketahanan akan tetap rentan. Oleh karena itu, dibutuhkan paradigma baru yang lebih adaptif dan partisipatif, dengan fokus pada reformasi institusional, penguatan peran masyarakat, dan strategi geopolitik yang lebih tajam di kawasan Indo-Pasifik.
References
Baldwin, D. A. (1997). The concept of security. Review of International Studies, 23(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210597000053
Boin, A., McConnell, A., & ’t Hart, P. (2010). Crisis exploitation: Political and policy impacts of framing contests. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(1), 81–106. https://doi.org/-10.1080/13501760903382607
Briguglio, L., Cordina, G., Farrugia, N., & Vella, S. (2009). Economic vulnerability and resilience: Concepts and measurements. Oxford Development Studies, 37(3), 229–247. https://-doi.org/10.1080/13600810903089893
Chester, M. V., Pincetl, S., & Elizabeth, C. (2021). Towards resilient infrastructure systems. Nature Sustainability, 4(8), 673–680. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00735-7
Chickering, R., & Förster, S. (2003). The shadows of total war: Europe, East Asia, and the United States, 1919–1939. Cambridge University Press.
Clausewitz, C. V. (1832). On war. (M. Howard & P. Paret, Eds.). Princeton University Press.
Connelly, A. L. (2010). Indonesia in ASEAN: Regional leadership aspirations in the midst of institutional challenges. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 32(1), 1–28.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Duit, A. (2016). Resilience thinking: Lessons for public administration. Public Administration, 94(2), 364–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12182
George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. MIT Press.
Hanlon, R. J., & Christie, K. (2018). Freedom from fear, freedom from want: An introduction to human security. University of Toronto Press.
Hastings, M. (2011). Inferno: The world at war, 1939–1945. Alfred A. Knopf.
Kahin, G. M. (2003). Nationalism and revolution in Indonesia. Cornell University Press.
Kapucu, N., & Garayev, V. (2011). Collaborative decision-making in emergency and disaster management. International Journal of Public Administration, 34(6), 366–375. https://-doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2011.561477
Kennedy, D. M. (1999). Freedom from fear: The American people in depression and war, 1929–1945. Oxford University Press.
Kershaw, I. (2000). The Nazi dictatorship: Problems and perspectives of interpretation. Arnold.
Lusthaus, C., Adrien, M. H., Anderson, G., Carden, F., & Montalván, G. P. (2002). Organizational assessment: A framework for improving performance. IDRC.
Marwick, A. (1974). War and social change in the Twentieth Century. Macmillan.
Mazower, M. (1998). Dark continent: Europe's Twentieth Century. Vintage.
Nye, J. S. (2010). The future of power. PublicAffairs.
Overy, R. (1995). Why the allies won. W.W. Norton & Company.
Simola, H. (2020). Comprehensive security in Finland: A national approach in a changing international environment. Finnish Journal of International Affairs, 1(1), 25–38.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
3.png)
1.png)
1.png)
