Developing an Instrument to Measure Student Acceptance of the Academic Information System (SIAKAD) at UNS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17977/um021v10i12025p83-94Keywords:
Structural Equation Modeling (SEM), Academic Information System (SIAKAD), Behavioral Intention, Convergent Validity, Use BehaviorAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi validitas dan reliabilitas model pengukuran serta menguji hubungan antar konstruk dalam model penerimaan Sistem Informasi Akademik (SIAKAD) dengan pendekatan Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Instrumen penelitian mencakup konstruk Perfomance Expentancy (PE), Effort Expenctancy (EE), Sosial Influence (SI), Facilitating Conditions (FC), Behavioral Intention (BI), dan Use Behavior (UB). Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa sebagian besar indikator memenuhi syarat validitas konvergen (loading faktor ≥ 0,5), meskipun terdapat beberapa indikator lemah. Dari segi reliabilitas, hanya konstruk Use Behavior (UB) yang memiliki reliabilitas tinggi (CR = 0,796), sementara konstruk lain berada dalam kategori cukup hingga kurang. Evaluasi model struktural menunjukkan bahwa Perfomance Expentancy (PE), Social Inflence (SI), dan Faciliating Conditions (FC) signifikan terhadap Behavioral Intention (BI) maupun Use Behavior (UB), sedangkan Effort Expenctancy (EE) tidak berpengaruh signifikan. Behavioral Intention (BI) terbukti sebagai variabel mediasi yang kuat terhadap Use Behavior (UB) (β = 0,832; p < 0,001). Analisis goodness of fit mengonfirmasi bahwa model memiliki kesesuaian yang sangat baik dengan data empiris (CFI = 0,983; RMSEA = 0,030). Temuan ini menekankan pentingnya kepercayaan, dukungan sosial, dan fasilitas dalam meningkatkan pemanfaatan sistem informasi, serta perlunya peningkatan kualitas instrumen untuk pengukuran yang lebih akurat di masa mendatang.
References
Abdurrahman, L., & Mulyana, R. (2022). Pemodelan Nilai Teknologi Informasi Menggunakan Structural Equation Modeling (Sem). JIPI (Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Informatika), 7(2), 469–477. https://doi.org/10.29100/jipi.v7i2.2825
Akour, M., & Alenezi, M. (2022). Higher Education Future in the Era of Digital Transformation Mohammad Akour and Mamdouh Alenezi * Software. Education Sciences, 12(784), 1–13.
Alenezi, M. (2023). Digital Learning and Digital Institution in Higher Education. Education Sciences, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13010088
Alenezi, M., Wardat, S., & Akour, M. (2023). The Need of Integrating Digital Education in Higher Education: Challenges and Opportunities. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(6), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064782
Anam, D. K., Kurniawan, B. S., & Widodo, Z. D. (2023). Influence of the Quality of Academic Information Systems (SIAKAD) and Service Quality on Student Satisfaction Faculty of Economics and Business Utp Surakarta. Asian Journal of Applied Business and Management, 2(4), 617–628. https://doi.org/10.55927/ajabm.v2i4.6855
Anam, M., Fitria, A., & Sidik, F. (2023). Digital divide in Indonesian higher education: Impacts of low technology adoption on learning outcomes. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 26(2), 112-125. https://doi.org/10.2307/jeductechsoci.26.2.112
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Dwivedi, Y. K., Rana, N. P., Jeyaraj, A., Clement, M., & Williams, M. D. (2019). Re-examining the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT): Towards a Revised Theoretical Model. Information Systems Frontiers, 21(3), 719–734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-017-9774-y
Fitria, T. N. (2023). Analysis of English lecturer assessment using academic information system (SIAKAD) institution. Journal of Applied Studies in Language, 7(1), 86–98. https://doi.org/10.31940/jasl.v7i1.86-98
Fook, C. Y., & Sidhu, G. K. (2009). Integrating Information and Communication Technology (ICT) into University Teaching and Learning : A Case Study. Asian Journal of University Education, 5(1), 71–94.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
Handayani, T. (2013). Analisis Penerimaan Sistem Informasi Akademik Berbasis Web Mengunakan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) dan Usability (Studi Kasus pada STTNAS Yogyakarta). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Rekayasa Teknologi Industri Dan Informasi, 101–107. https://journal.sttnas.ac.id/ReTII/article/view/120
Hikmawati, F., Manajemen, J., Syariah, B., Ekonomi, F., Islam, B., & Pontianak, I. (2023). Manfaat Sistem Informasi Akademik (SIAKAD) Dalam Perguruan Tinggi. Jurnal Ilmiah Rekayasa Dan Manajemen Sistem Informasi, 9(1), 45–51.
Ismail. Muhammad Fahreza, Sari, N. R., & Farild, M. (2022). Meningkatkan kualitas penyajian laporan keuangan melalui sistem informasi akuntansi berbasis ERP-SAP. Study of Scientific and Behavioral Management (SSBM), 3(4), 29–38. http://journal.uin-alauddin.ac.id/index.php/ssbm
Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
Luthfatul Qibtiyah, & Desta Fitriyani. (2023). Lecturers And Students Perceptions Of Web-Based Learning With Simaster. Fikroh: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pendidikan Islam, 16(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.37812/fikroh.v16i1.686
Mewengkang, R., Tumbel, G., Mamonto, F., & Rotty, V. N. J. (2021). Implementasi Kebijakan Sistem Informasi Manajemen Akademik Di Universitas Negeri Manado. YUME : Journal of Management, 4(2), 318–339. https://doi.org/10.37531/yume.vxix.234
Pusparini, N. N., & Sani, A. (2021). Mengukur Keberhasilan Penerapan Sistem Informasi Akademik Dengan Model Kesuksesan Delon and Mclean. METHOMIKA Jurnal Manajemen Informatika Dan Komputerisasi Akuntansi, 4(2), 149–155. https://doi.org/10.46880/jmika.vol4no2.pp149-155
Rahiem, M. D. H. (2021). Indonesian University Students’ Likes and Dislikes about Emergency Remote Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v17i1.11525
Safkaur, T. L. (2024). Effectiveness of Using Online Academic Information System ( Siakad ) At Uncen ’ S Faculty of Social and Political Sciences. Asian Journal of Engineering, Social, and Health, 59(195). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46799/ajesh.v2i4.54
Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Pick, M., Liengaard, B. D., Radomir, L., & Ringle, C. M. (2022). Progress in partial least squares structural equation modeling use in marketing research in the last decade. Psychology and Marketing, 39(5), 1035–1064. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21640
Setyowati, K. D., Chamidy, T., & Faisal, M. (2024). Analysis of Academic Information System Using Information System Success Model and System Quality Model Case Study of Institut Teknologi Nasional Malang. Transaction on Informatics and Data Science Vol., 1(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24090/tids.v1i1.12234
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D [Quantitative, qualitative, and R&D research methods]. Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. (2022). Metode penelitian kuantitatif [Quantitative research methods] (2nd ed.). Alfabeta.
Sukatiman, S., Akhyar, M., Roemintoyo, R., & Siswandari, S. (2019). Framework of the Blended Learning in Vocational Study to Achieve Hot Skills. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 317(IConProCS), 239–244. https://doi.org/10.2991/iconprocs-19.2019.50
