Hustle Culture Glorification Contradicts Cyberloafing Behavior Among Gen Z on Social Media

Authors

  • Anisa Rizki Sabrina Universitas Negeri Malang
  • Ratna Triwurian Danu Universitas Negeri Malang
  • Fairuza Arindra Universitas Negeri Malang
  • Daffa Zanetta Universitas Negeri Malang
  • Fajar Haris Pratama Universitas Negeri Malang
  • Kurnia Kusuma Syafitri The University of Melbourne

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17977/um087v3i22026p119-131

Keywords:

Digital disengagement, performative labor, platform economy, online identity, youth work ethics

Abstract

Indonesia's Generation Z, the largest cohort in the country's demographic bonus, navigates digital spaces shaped by both hustle culture and cyberloafing. Existing scholarship treats the two as separate or opposing constructs. This study examines how Gen Z constructs and performs success under hustle culture, the forms and motives of cyberloafing, and how the two shape each other. Using a netnographic design, we analyzed 98 posts and 18 comments from 40 accounts on Instagram, TikTok, and Twitter/X, published in 2023–2025 and collected between February and May 2025 through hashtag searches. Content was included if publicly accessible, Indonesian-language, and explicitly about work or study productivity or disengagement. Data were coded in two cycles using summative content analysis and interpreted through performative labor theory, digital capitalism, and symbolic interactionism. Hustle culture appeared as romanticized overwork, aestheticized productivity, and community validation; cyberloafing appeared as stress relief, micro-resistance, and identity negotiation. The study's contribution is to show that the two form a continuum rather than opposites: the visibility pressures of hustle culture generate the need for disengagement, which is then reintegrated into the attention economy. By recasting cyberloafing as a performative practice rather than workplace deviance, it extends digital labor scholarship with Indonesian platform evidence.

Author Biography

Ratna Triwurian Danu, Universitas Negeri Malang

Communication Studies

References

Abidin, C. (2020). Mapping Internet Celebrity on TikTok: Exploring Attention Economies and Visibility Labours. Cultural Science Journal, 12(1), 77–103. https://doi.org/10.5334/csci.140

Askew, K., Buckner, J. E., Taing, M. U., Ilie, A., Bauer, J. A., & Coovert, M. D. (2014). Explaining cyberloafing: The role of the theory of planned behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 510–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2014.04.006

Benner, C. (n.d.). Work in the New Economy Flexible Labor Markets in Silicon Valley.

Berger, A. A. (2017). Cultural perspectives on millennials. Cultural Perspectives on Millennials, 1–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69685-0/COVER

boyd, danah. (2020). It’s Complicated. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300166439

Butler, J. (2011). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, 1–236. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203824979

Chou, S. Y. (2012). Millennials in the Workplace: A Conceptual Analysis of Millennials’ Leadership and Followership Styles. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 2(2), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.5296/IJHRS.V2I2.1568

Duffy, B. E., & Hund, E. (2015). “Having it All” on Social Media: Entrepreneurial Femininity and Self-Branding Among Fashion Bloggers. Social Media and Society, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115604337;PAGE:STRING:ARTICLE/CHAPTER

Fuchs, C. (2014). Digital labour and Karl Marx. Digital Labour and Karl Marx, 1–404. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315880075

Gill, R., & Pratt, A. (2008). In the Social Factory?: Immaterial Labour, Precariousness and Cultural Work. Theory, Culture & Society, 25(8), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276408097794;CTYPE:STRING:JOURNAL

Helsper, E. J. (2014). Alice E. Marwick, Status Update: Celebrity, Publicity, and Branding in the Social Media Age. International Journal of Communication, 8(368), 1113–1117. https://books.google.com/books/about/Status_Update.html?hl=id&id=RV3FoAEACAAJ

Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687;WEBSITE:WEBSITE:SAGE;JOURNAL:JOURNAL:QHRA;REQUESTEDJOURNAL:JOURNAL:QHRA;WGROUP:STRING:PUBLICATION

IDN Research Institute. (2024). IDN Research Institute. https://www.idntimes.com/tag/indonesia-gen-z-report-2024

Kim, K., del Carmen Triana, M., Chung, K., & Oh, N. (2016). When Do Employees Cyberloaf? An Interactionist Perspective Examining Personality, Justice, and Empowerment. Human Resource Management, 55(6), 1041–1058. https://doi.org/10.1002/HRM.21699

Kozinets, R. V. . (2010). Netnography : doing ethnographic research online. 221.

Kozinets, R. V. . (2020). Netnography the essential guide to qualitative social media research. https://books.google.com/books/about/Netnography.html?hl=id&id=Yx2yDwAAQBAJ

Kozinets, R. V. (2015). Netnograpgy: Redifined. 2nd Edition,SAGE Publications Ltd c Pte Ltd, ( Robert Kozinets 2015), 1–305. https://www.academia.edu/14369681/Netnography_Redefined

Leaver, Tama., Highfield, Tim., & Abidin, Crystal. (2020). Instagram : visual social media cultures. 264. https://www.wiley.com/en-mx/Instagram%3A+Visual+Social+Media+Cultures-p-9781509534395

Lim, V. K. G. (2002). The IT way of loafing on the job: Cyberloafing, neutralizing and organizational justice. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(5), 675–694. https://doi.org/10.1002/JOB.161;PAGEGROUP:STRING:PUBLICATION

Munsch, A. (2021). Millennial and generation Z digital marketing communication and advertising effectiveness: A qualitative exploration. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 31(1), 10–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/21639159.2020.1808812

Nabila, S., Laurend, C. A., & Kurniawati, E. (2024). The Influence of Twitter Social Media Usage on Student Behavior. Cakra Communico: Journal of Communication Science, 1(2), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.17977/UM087V1I2202468-75

Nasrullah;, R. (2017). Media Sosial: Perspektif Komunikasi, Budaya, dan Sosioteknologi. //10.103.0.43:80%2Findex.php%3Fp%3Dshow_detail%26id%3D586

Neilson, B., & Rossiter, N. (2005). From precarity to precariousness and back again : labour, life and unstable networks. Fibreculture Journal, (5). https://researchers.westernsydney.edu.au/en/publications/from-precarity-to-precariousness-and-back-again-labour-life-and-u/

Pradipta, A. R., & Lincoln, A. R. (2024). The Influence of Concert Promotion Through Instagram on Interest in Purchasing Music Concert Tickets Post Covid-19 Pandemic. Cakra Communico: Journal of Communication Science, 1(2), 76–86. https://doi.org/10.17977/UM087V1I2202476-86

Sandoval, M. (2018). From passionate labour to compassionate work: Cultural co-ops, do what you love and social change. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 21(2), 113–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549417719011;CTYPE:STRING:JOURNAL

Scholz, T. (2012). Digital labor: The internet as playground and factory. Digital Labor: The Internet as Playground and Factory, 1–264. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203145791

Suryani, A., G Watt, H. M., & Richardson, P. W. (2013). Teaching as a career: Perspectives of Indonesian future teachers. http://pmb.ums.ac.id/2011/alumni

Triandis, H. C. (2018). Individualism and collectivism. Individualism and Collectivism, 1–259. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429499845/INDIVIDUALISM-COLLECTIVISM-HARRY-TRIANDIS/RIGHTS-AND-PERMISSIONS

Yuningsih, Y., & Prasetya, M. (2022). Technology Makes Hustle Culture Still Happened in Pandemic Covid 19. https://doi.org/10.4108/EAI.7-10-2021.2316240

Downloads

Published

2026-10-26

How to Cite

Sabrina, A. R., Danu, R. T., Arindra, F., Zanetta, D. ., Pratama, F. H., & Syafitri, K. K. (2026). Hustle Culture Glorification Contradicts Cyberloafing Behavior Among Gen Z on Social Media. Cakra Communico: Journal of Communication Science, 3(2), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.17977/um087v3i22026p119-131

Issue

Section

Articles